In the Assembly addressed the following topics:
1) Report on meeting of Wednesday May 4, 2011
attended the meeting:
- representatives ATE: M. Sun and R. Copley Arrechea;
- UTE Representatives: Mark Stephen Schmelling and Sueyro
- The Director of Legal and Technical: Francisco Baratta
- The Chief Operating Officer Cultural Promotion: Guillermo González Heredia
- PCB General Coordinator: Carlos Diviesti
Finance The representative did not attend. For this reason joint was determined date (which led to a long discussion.) However, as stated in the Minutes of the meeting, was established on Monday 9 May as a day to announce date to carry out the subparitaria (a sectoral outside the predetermined central parity).
was also reported that, after exchanges of views between the parties in the proposed subparitaria address issues of PCB Teachers' Statute, equal pay, pay-regulated in early 2012 of the assets of teachers and recognition of the age of personal.
2) Suggestions and recommendations UTE:
- Since our pay is still low, is not to pose a "wage recovery" in terms of percentages, it would still remain below what is paid time professorship in education (a good percentage of poverty is still a pittance)
- convenient thing, as we are asking, would talk about a "equal pay" . And this equation would be in relation to the time chair of the non-formal education teachers (which, of course, charge more than us and several other benefits).
- Another important recommendation is that instead of asking for a pass to "permanent staff" consider asking the plant through the figure of teacher recruitment, that is, through internships and Securitization . (Attached is the decree of securitization of ADEM as an example)
- understood, do not talk about the pass but do not ask in what way recruitment would be done. Asking only the permanent staff and administrative and would enter the other way as teachers, with the advantages that this entails. Anyway, is a theme further explored.
3) Failure to pay increases:
Most teachers in the program did not collect the agreed salary increases. According to officials of the ministry was in error because the information was never updated human resources. Teachers who were paid to the increase are those at Meta4 system was updated (ie, as what happened to the recovery of wages). Still, there are teachers who did get paid with an increase but a month and not others. It would be good to review what they have claimed to do a check on this and eventually make the corresponding claim. (Attached is circular with corresponding values \u200b\u200bso they can compare)
4) Collective Bargaining Act Silvia Oddi sent by mail signed by Sutecba (posted on the blog):
Given the doubts, it's worth noting that these meager increases were agreed by the Joint Sutecba held this central year and have nothing to do with the fight we are carrying out. In the central parity not call on us and it is so important to give the value for the subparitaria has been agreed with the GCBA.
(A PCB teachers belong to us the values \u200b\u200bof the first column, the other is for the Cultural Inclusion Program).
On the outcome of the meeting it was resolved:
* Performing Assembly prior to the date of subparitaria convened. It raises discuss and define the points and issues to take to this subparitaria. Tentatively
determining the Saturday 14 May to 13hs. Eternauta as the date, time and place to conduct this Assembly which was voted unanimously.
If the date is equal to propose to us before this day, the Assembly will be held the day prior to such parity. Be confirmed in due course.
tolerance is established regarding the organization and information of the joint (one or two weeks).
- Because they usually can not solve all the issues that are part of our claims in a single joint, raised consider equal pay and Antiquity and priority for the short term and teaching issue of the statute as a central theme for the medium term, in the sense that it must be analyzed and assembled by more than one person. For this reason there is a need to work on it, with people of ATE Education and UTE.
Claudia Petrone's partner is offered to revise the Status of Art and the Draft Statute prepared in due course by the International Board of Delegates (which was signed but not published by Lombardi, therefore be taken as a precedent for the new statute to conform) and make the necessary consultations (lawyers, notaries public, legislators, etc.).. who can are invited to collaborate at this point now to make the necessary contributions and raise doubts and differences. This is an issue that will take some time and it is very important not to do on the run since this statute will affect the operation of the program and our job situation. (Contact for this with claudia.petrone @ yahoo.com.ar )
María Sol Copley's partner he would come back to ask for the issue of GH ANSES.
continue in a state of mobilization, and permanent assembly.
all attachments in the mail and more are the blog http://centrosculturaleslucha.blogspot.com/
Greetings,
Eduardo Otero Marcela Gayoso
156-961-3385 \u200b\u200b
0 comments:
Post a Comment