The meeting began with the report of the companion Claudia was moving about the work of the committee that made the task of beginning to prepare the statute.
In the context of this work, reported that the joint venture partners who are collaborating with us, we argued that rather than build a new statute, it was desirable to take the General Directorate of Artistic Education (which is the is being taken as the base) and modify it with a section ("area") which contains the PCB with its peculiarities, as the general guidelines are the same and because it is Quick feasible and approved, with a law, an amendment to the statute, rather than having to complete a new statute adopted only in our program. It was clarified that the situation is exactly the same and that there are other programs included in this way.
from UTE also suggested that it is best to seek approval as law and not under a decree, as it has more weight, since a decree can be dissolved with another at any time and leave us in the same situation. This implies that the road could be longer because you have to take the trouble to go talk to the legislators to know and support our claims and enact into law, but it is the safest way. Also suggested that they undertake to speak to the legislators who are related (as are those who passed the inclusion in the 3500 Teacher Statute other partners) and that this request will be included Cultural Inclusion (formerly Community Culture) and Spaces Cultural Rights, which are in a similar situation.
Given all this, our meeting consensus was that was the right thing to continue in this way, that is, accepting the suggestions of the people of UTE.
Then
Sun's partner spoke about meeting with GH by the statute, noting that the coordinators have asked participants time to acquaint themselves with the situation (read thoroughly the status mainly), because they had been summoned on short notice , so that they could not do it. In the assembly was raised as expected within the next meeting on Thursday 26 / 5, would have solved this way forward.
companion also reported on his meeting with Finance, which raised the wage comparison with tertiary teachers ($ 147 when chair) and Finance Minister (José Ohrnialián) was to "make numbers" and to provide a response within the next week (since it would not be in Buenos Aires this week) . You raised the issue of status and the urgency of it. Ohrnialián agreed and said he signed it and, faced with the urgency, said times were dependent on us (ergo, the moment that we were ready status), he was willing to approve. The issue of age was also raised and it was agreed that an item is directly linked to the statute, that babble again in that context.
talks on other issues, the general highlighted the progress being made in our organization as PCB workers, embodied in the continuity of meetings, discussion, information obtained, etc. Also in particular colleagues who are taking charge of important tasks still in the context of decisions colectivamente.Nuevamente highlighted the issue of reaching the largest number of educational and cultural centers as possible, using reference points and with all methods that are within our reach.
On the other hand, resumed the discussion of need, waiting times, on issues like the subject protest wage increase, also on the possibility of a mobilization as a form of pressure, and the trust or not the result of negotiations with the Government of the City. In other words, on how to continue advancing in our struggle.
was again proposed the need to join ATE, stating that while not directly correspond with our educational (in this case was mentioned UTE), could be useful to us for negotiation with the GCBA at the present stage. In this connection reference was made to affiliates who may unsubscribe at any time, so that the partners felt it necessary to present that membership forms were taken to ATE.También spoke of the possibility of dual affiliation with UTE for those who sees fit. But always as a means to strengthen our struggle.
With the above, it was resolved:
-Propose maximum waiting time (not fully defined in the assembly) to get answers about Our hypothesis for both the short and medium term.
short term on a wage increase.
view it next week Finance Minister promised to give an answer.
Medium-term: to obtain a teaching status for the PCB according to the expectations and the work done for that purpose. (At most end of June).
-Retaking pose on our situation to ANSES, which was one of the concerns raised in previous meetings.
GCBA -Raise the coordinators and the need to ensure our continued employment next year (also in the short term).
-Carlos Diviesti request a list of all employees of the PCB, so we have a clear idea about it. This will the Sun in the meeting next Thursday (26 / 5).
Execute a festival / cultural and artistic journey in an open space.
This activity would aim to learn more, both inward and outward, our status as workers and the general program. Also as an encounter between teachers, students, neighbors, to raise all that is being done based on the Program and its continuity with dignity. Also as a more of the permanent mobilization, which are framed assemblies, meetings with government and business in general. The date would be raised on Sunday 26 June.
-Next
Meeting: Thursday, June 2 as a first option. This according to already have the proposed new Treasury. Otherwise (if you have not had news) will happen on Monday 6 June. The schedule is at 20.30 pm at location to be confirmed (suggestions accepted).
The agenda would focus on the Treasury's proposal but also in the organization of the Day (groups or solo artists who will participate, schedule, etc.). And to remain in STATE OF MOBILIZATION AND ASSEMBLY STANDING until they are completed to solve all the problems already raised.
Remember that this and other information (status, etc.) Are in the blog centrosculturaleslucha.blogspot.com
Greetings
Andrés Shahbazi
María Sol Copley
15 4076 1003
