Simi Grewal In Mera Naam Joker Changing Clothes

reunion with Gonzalez Heredia on April 18

First, is important to know that there were several focal points (about 15 or more calculus I), several students and many teachers. In the central table sat GH, Carlos Diviesti, Silvia Oddi and María Sol Copley.

many topics were discussed in view of the audience and the manner of the meeting (they spoke all they wanted, enough to be recorded), which in this report will only mention the relevant and which are directly related to our past and future actions the framework of the struggle to improve the situation of PCB.

attended by representatives of the guild first joint venture, which also has members within the PCB. As they posed, their position is consistent with ours and their demands are the same. Clarified that no came to deal with any union. GH

starts talking quoted as saying that we are willing to address the issues cited in the circular 18 to solve together. From there, start talking about the various competing addressing issues such as:

· Statute. GH, based on our original proposal, proposes to further meetings on this topic, modeled on the Municipal School of Drama (NFE), the VAT (Culture), etc. Tells us who we choose to participate in these meetings (in addition to the Legal and Technical someone and he, are essential). Cree can not be solved in less than two or three months.

· Wages. Match gral. they are outdated. While starting in May will be given a staged increase of 30% approx. (For approval for an increase that will be awarded to the GCBA administrative employees, whose approval is already an obligation because it is contained in a decree), we propose that this increase should not be staggered and will add 50% based on the time Chair of Non-Formal teaching. GH Silvia Oddi no opinion but says it can not because it goes against the decree, approving the increases, what I said earlier. M. Sun says that is a fabrication and can be given well further increase beyond that decree, which can go on separate tracks. Oddi insists, but his voice is silenced with the popular clamor.

· permanent plant. Our first claim. In this regard, these contradictory Oddi (which at this point makes it clear to any potential naive whose side play) and GH: one says that to create such a plant has to be made of the statute and another says that it is the reverse, which first plant must be created. They noted the contradiction, but still not agree. GH said that he intends to move on to all plant.

· Joined . There was no talk in detail about it but GH said it was one of the things I wanted to solve (to be recognized antiquity)

· Collection on time. Liability arose or coordinators in the payments of teachers do not go on time-since, according to those of GH, some project coordinators did not send the preset time for him that can then be related administrative procedures time also. As GH is impossible for this process is carried out in monkeys than two months, which suggested that projects be sent before September 30 to recover on time.

· Joint Sectoral . While not among the "topics" of Circular 18 (as opposed to all the above), and had not been discussed previously with GH, M. Sun argues that, given the unreliability of the word of GH currently caused the vast majority of teachers, a peer was the only way to ensure that what is agreed to have a legal weight such that much more difficult non-compliance. Indeed, as the area where we discuss all the issues relating to employers and workers, all points of agreement would be endorsed in this instance and generate greater confidence given the legal value of what is signed in this field. The popular outcry in favor of this measure is evident. GH thinks and doubts. Oddi again try to derail the proposal with arguments such as "the statute can not be done in a joint" and such like. M. Sun returns to clarify his approach: the signature on a parity (dated next to define but early) all points are agreed, and from there it sets up a commission to lay out the statute. GH accepted.

So, GH undertakes to set on Wednesday, April 27 (for loop) a date some of Joint to begin the resolution of all the topics covered. But in return calls to lift the measure on Tuesday 19 and makes it clear that he would not be so closed the negotiating table. We said that mobilization was transformed into an assembly to inform the agreement which had been developed, as decided by the assembly. He said "Do it in a cultural center, not the door of the House of Culture." M. Sun says that we can run a few meters, but more because people were already mentioned there. He says no, to be notified to the people who became a cultural center. This tug of war lasted 30 minutes, with arguments of both sides and and closed the table, remains unresolved. The output-assembly improvises a meeting between teachers and decided to maintain the rendezvous point (House of Culture) and if there were many competing we went to the Plaza de Mayo to avoid creating more stress given the situation Living in a time of negotiation and have at least committed to a date of parity. We talked about that, beyond the lack of credibility in his words, at a time when trading is not more than momentarily trust in what they promise. But it was also clear that without fulfilling his word, we would realize a much larger mobilization (and much more angry!). Regarding this, they emphasized the fact remain on alert and not to lower the arms to see fulfilled their promises, but also know how to negotiate and take advantage of times when it seems possible.

Remember that this and all information is in the blog: www. centrosculturaleslucha . blogspot. Com
María Sol Copley 15 4076 1003